Sixty-fifth session
SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 1645th MEETING
Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Tuesday, 3 August 2004, at 10 a.m.
Chairman: Mr. YUTZIS
CONTENTS
The meeting was called to order at 10.10 a.m.
ORGANIZATIONAL AND OTHER MATTERS (agenda item 2) (continued)
Debate on the prevention of genocide
41. The CHAIRMAN drew the Committee's attention to a proposal by Mr. Shaki to hold a thematic debate on the prevention of genocide. He invited Mr. Shaki to introduce the topic and asked members to comment on the proposal. 42. Mr. SHAKI said that, while the question of the prevention of genocide had long been on the international agenda, the quest for effective measures had gained momentum with the international conference against genocide held in Stockholm in January 2004. The international community had been greatly troubled by the genocide in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. In his address to the Stockholm International Forum, the Secretary-General had acknowledged his own failure to take action in the case of Rwanda and had pointed out that, while the international community had had the capacity to prevent those events, it had lacked the will. 43. The Secretary-General had stressed the need to take action and subsequently appointed a Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide. While the establishment of such a post was a positive step, the adviser's capacity for action beyond reporting to the Security Council was, unfortunately, limited. Similarly, the Committee's early warning and urgent action procedures were insufficient. According to a recent report, the threat of genocide existed in some 12 countries. 44. The Carnegie Foundation's recommendation to establish a rapid reaction force that could be deployed within 72 hours in cases of emergency had, thus far, not been given the Security Council's approval. Regrettably, the Committee had failed to take note of that recommendation. The United States had stated its willingness to allocate US$ 17 million to the training of national contingents for peace enforcement duties under the mandate of the Security Council. However, the decision to take action ultimately lay with the Council. 45. The world was passing though a crisis, and racism and xenophobia were among the symptoms of that crisis. While treaty bodies expended considerable effort in trying to address such problems, he had limited confidence in the international community's resolve to take action. The consideration of measures to prevent genocide fell within the Committee's mandate and he encouraged its members to discuss methods for the detection of impending acts of genocide, and also possible recommendations to the Security Council. Such a debate was of vital importance, as the right to life was the basis for the enjoyment of all other rights. 46. Mr. ABOUL-NASR said that he considered a lengthy discussion on the prevention of genocide neither advisable nor useful. The definition of the crime of genocide was contained in a variety of relevant international treaties. Similarly, he saw no need to discuss appropriate responses to acts of genocide, since the Charter of the United Nations provided clear guidelines on lawful action in such cases; responsibility for taking action lay with the Security Council. 47. Mr. KJAERUM, supported by Mr. Amir and Mr. de Gouttes, agreed that there was no need for the Committee to discuss the definition of genocide. Genocide was the most terrible of human rights violations and the most extreme form of racial discrimination and intolerance. At present, the Committee was ill-prepared for addressing the severe human rights violations that could lead to genocide but a debate on preventive action was necessary. 48. He proposed a dual approach to the issue. On the one hand, it would be useful to establish whether the Committee was in a position to recommend new procedures for action to the Security Council. At the same time, early methods of detecting the threat of genocide during the consideration of country reports should be discussed. In that connection, it would be useful to consider means of impressing upon Governments the need to counteract such trends. 49. Mr. AMIR said the elimination of policies that provided fertile ground for genocide was a central concern. Genocide mostly occurred in the context of armed conflicts. Establishing effective mechanisms for both conflict prevention and the protection of civilian populations in the context of war was, therefore, crucial to the prevention of genocide. He stressed the need to call on all States that had ratified international human rights instruments to establish such mechanisms. 50. Mr. de GOUTTES said the Committee should focus on evaluating effective preventive measures on a case-by-case basis, similar to the retrospective analysis of the country reports in the aftermath of the tragedies in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. The Committee had then found that, while signs of impending genocide had indeed been present, they had not been sufficiently heeded. Reviving the early warning and urgent action procedures to improve detection of signs of impending genocide was therefore an important element in preventing such tragedies. He called on the Committee to address the situation in Darfur in the context of the thematic debate. 51. The CHAIRMAN proposed structuring the debate around three major topics: a retrospective assessment of the Committee's decisions and recommendations in connection with the former Yugoslavia; re-examination of the criteria concerning early warning and urgent action mechanisms; and consideration of specific urgent cases, such as Darfur.